You are here: wiki > Control of wave-energy point absorbers
Search Wiki
Find information by searching. The search will give suggestions as you type.

List by author

Parameters

Search options

 

 

General
You can search for any word(s) in articles and/or articles by a specific author

 

Boolean
WIKI supports Boolean search methodology. The boolean full-text search capability supports the following operators:

+
A leading plus sign indicates that this word must be present in each row that is returned.

-
A leading minus sign indicates that this word must not be present in any of the rows that are returned.

Note: The - operator acts only to exclude rows that are otherwise matched by other search terms. Thus, a boolean-mode search that contains only terms preceded by - returns an empty result. It does not return “all rows except those containing any of the excluded terms.”

(no operator)

By default (when neither + nor - is specified) the word is optional, but the rows that contain it are rated higher. This mimics the behavior of MATCH() ... AGAINST() without the IN BOOLEAN MODE modifier.


> <
These two operators are used to change a word's contribution to the relevance value that is assigned to a row. The > operator increases the contribution and the < operator decreases it. See the example following this list.


( )
Parentheses group words into subexpressions. Parenthesized groups can be nested.

 

~
A leading tilde acts as a negation operator, causing the word's contribution to the row's relevance to be negative. This is useful for marking “noise” words. A row containing such a word is rated lower than others, but is not excluded altogether, as it would be with the - operator.


*
The asterisk serves as the truncation (or wildcard) operator. Unlike the other operators, it should be appended to the word to be affected. Words match if they begin with the word preceding the * operator.

If a word is specified with the truncation operator, it is not stripped from a boolean query, even if it is too short (as determined from the ft_min_word_len setting) or a stopword. This occurs because the word is not seen as too short or a stopword, but as a prefix that must be present in the document in the form of a word that begins with the prefix. Suppose that ft_min_word_len=4. Then a search for '+word +the*' will likely return fewer rows than a search for '+word +the':

The former query remains as is and requires both word and the* (a word starting with the) to be present in the document.

The latter query is transformed to +word (requiring only word to be present). the is both too short and a stopword, and either condition is enough to cause it to be ignored.


"
A phrase that is enclosed within double quote (“"”) characters matches only rows that contain the phrase literally, as it was typed. The full-text engine splits the phrase into words and performs a search in the FULLTEXT index for the words. Nonword characters need not be matched exactly: Phrase searching requires only that matches contain exactly the same words as the phrase and in the same order. For example, "test phrase" matches "test, phrase".

If the phrase contains no words that are in the index, the result is empty. For example, if all words are either stopwords or shorter than the minimum length of indexed words, the result is empty.

 

EXAMPLES
The following examples demonstrate some search strings that use boolean full-text operators:

'apple banana'
Find rows that contain at least one of the two words.


'+apple +juice'
Find rows that contain both words.


'+apple macintosh'
Find rows that contain the word “apple”, but rank rows higher if they also contain “macintosh”.


'+apple -macintosh'
Find rows that contain the word “apple” but not “macintosh”.


'+apple ~macintosh'
Find rows that contain the word “apple”, but if the row also contains the word “macintosh”, rate it lower than if row does not. This is “softer” than a search for '+apple -macintosh', for which the presence of “macintosh” causes the row not to be returned at all.


'+apple +(>turnover Find rows that contain the words “apple” and “turnover”, or “apple” and “strudel” (in any order), but rank “apple turnover” higher than “apple strudel”.


'apple*'
Find rows that contain words such as “apple”, “apples”, “applesauce”, or “applet”.


'"some words"'
Find rows that contain the exact phrase “some words” (for example, rows that contain “some words of wisdom” but not “some noise words”). Note that the “"” characters that enclose the phrase are operator characters that delimit the phrase. They are not the quotation marks that enclose the search string itself. 


















Control of wave-energy point absorbers

2011-06-22 | From Julien Cretel

Wave-energy point absorbers can be described as linear, under-damped
oscillating systems excited by ocean waves. These devices are meant to be
installed offshore and operated in a variety of wave conditions, with a view to
producing energy from the oscillations they undergo. Optimization of the energy
produced by point absorbers is essential for those devices to become
commercially viable. As simple control approaches like linear damping typically
yields poor performance, more elaborate control strategies must be used to make
most of the wave-energy resource available on site.
Latching control, originally proposed by Budal & Falnes in the 1970s, stems from
frequency-domain considerations: oscillating systems such as point absorbers
generally have a natural frequency larger than wave frequencies and therefore
tend to lead in phase; by latching the oscillator, i.e. locking it into position during
part of the wave cycle, quasi-resonance can be achieved, which yields better
performance than simply damping the motion in a linear fashion.
Many authors present latching control as an enticing approach, mainly because,
despite its being passive, it reportedly yields good performance. Yet, a compelling
argument for applying latching control in practice may still be lacking. In this
poster, the legitimacy of latching (and variants such as declutching) as a control
approach for wave-energy point absorbers is critically reviewed. The theoretical
foundations of latching and the feasibility of its implementation in practice are
examined. The use of latching as a control strategy for wave-energy point
absorbers remains contentious. In particular, since latching is based on the
premise that no other point absorber (or oscillatory mode) is present, it may prove
inadequate for controlling systems of multiple point absorbers, such as the highly
anticipated “wave farms”.



Add your comment

You must be logged in to comment on content

Other articles by this author

Making wave-energy devices smart (2011-05-05)

This talk is strongly based on a presentation I gave at the 1st Doctoral Research Showcase, held in University College Cork, Ireland, in early June...

Model Predictive Control applied to a wave energy point absorber (2011-05-05)

This scientific poster was presented at the 4th INORE symposium, which was held in Dartmouth, England, on 9-14 May 2010.   Abstract: Wave e...

Making wave-energy devices smart (2011-05-05)

This talk is strongly based on a presentation I gave at the 1st Doctoral Research Showcase, held in University College Cork, Ireland, in early June...

Model Predictive Control applied to a wave energy point absorber (2011-05-05)

This scientific poster was presented at the 4th INORE symposium, which was held in Dartmouth, England, on 9-14 May 2010.   Abstract: Wave e...

2011-06-22 12:13

Kate Freeman has added a document

The document "A presentation given by Julien Cretel at INORE Symposium 2011, Alcoutim, Portugal" was added

2011-06-22 12:13

Kate Freeman has added the article

bottom